The Harley Quinn Lobotomy

Posted: April 15, 2013 in Gaming
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One would have to be brain-damaged to imagine Harley Quinn’s new ‘direction’ as progressive

Any semi-conscious fan would probably agree that art mediums such as comics and video games that are struggling to be recognized as able to ‘effectively convey serious adult themes’ should stay far away from mixing well-established characters and cheesy T&A (thats Tits and Ass, for all you crazy schoolkids)

As it turns out, most actually do not agree, so lets try that opening again:

Any self-respecting human-being would readily agree that sex-fantasy porn should be kept well away from being intermixed with a worthwhile plot and the characters therein. Unfortunately, it seems these ‘hu-mans’ are in short supply on planet ‘Urf’. As such, a great deal of market research has convinced many-a-company that we heterosexual men are little more than simple, lecherous, undisciplined, uncontrollable, sex-addled freaks who cannot possibly play a well-constructed game or read a thrilling tale without demanding that every female even remotely mentioned be promptly undressed (or arguably even worse, dressed up in some absurd ‘sexy’ fashion). I, for one, vehemently reject this fiction. However, following this insulting logic to its conclusion, heroines and fem. villains alike are ‘naturally’ on the chopping block. In this, DC comics and their video game extensions have headily stumbled into the spotlight.

Which Starfire do you suppose makes a better hero for a child, the first or the second? I know as an adult, I have no respect for the latter incarnation (nor her creators).

There is a great deal of difference between exploring a character’s sexuality in a mature fashion and creating a disgusting parody of the thing. This regression in the way our female heroines are being depicted is clearly illustrated in other gaming generas such as Mortal Kombat, which I have spoken about before at length. The release of DC’s “New 52” reboot of vital characters has created all the wrong kind of hype. Personally, I care about the integrity of both our male AND female heroes, and as it turns out, I’m not alone. From Starfire, to Catwoman, to Harley Quinn, fans who truly love the stories and themes these characters used to pioneer are being sorely disappointed. The much-anticipated game Injustice, will be featuring several classic DC heroines in about as much savvy attire as one can expect to find at a strip club. All respect to women of that profession. Period.
Apparently however (still following this logic), when men think of super-heroines, we think of ‘sexy’ back-flips and when women think of back-flips, they better make sure to keep their costumes unzipped.

women of arkham
Plot-driven, you say? Notice that she is not exposing herself for her fellow characters, but for YOU

Whats that? Catwoman has a background as a sex-worker? Well how fucking convenient! I suppose its actually kind of polite for these current writers to even bother with making a bullshit premise as opposed to just doing it with every female character. Oh no! Whats this…?

Voodoo, the first black female character to get her own DC ongoing series, [is] to open with her stripping on her knees while men throw money at her, because she has a previously established history of being a stripper. But let’s be honest — they didn’t make her a stripper because they really wanted to create a positive and well-rounded portrait of sex workers and how they exist in our culture.

Or did they!?
No. No they didn’t. In fact, this seems to be a pretty consistent theme. Color me a crazy conspiracy theorist, but I’m getting the creeping suspicion this type of bad writing is an excuse to tear down other ways interesting characters and replace them with softcore porn doppelgangers.

classic cat vs new
There is a vast difference between ‘sexy’ and ‘fantasy porn’

OK. Yes, Catwoman has long been established as ‘seductive’. Thats fucking fine! Michelle Pfeiffer did an especially excellent job playing the part live-action. But how pedantic does one have to be to willfully convince themselves there is no difference between playing off a character’s sexuality and objectifying it? There’s a difference between writing a female character as sexually liberated, and writing her as wish-fulfillment-sex-object. This is not empowering for the female readers. This is not empowering for the characters. And this is not amusing to me. This is regressive, offensive, BULLSHIT and it stains everything that this type of garbage is connected to.

This is not about these women wanting things; it’s about men wanting to see them do things, and that takes something that really should be empowering — the idea that women can own their sexuality — and transforms it into yet another male fantasy. It takes away the actual power of the women and turns their “sexual liberation” into just another way for dudes to get off. And that is at least ten times as gross as regular cheesecake, minimum.

Take as a for-example, Batman Arkham City. I wanted to flow with the hype and like that game, I REALLY did. But every time Catwoman would bob her center-mass on screen or turn gaily around to highlight her ‘curves’, I was completely knocked out of the immersion. Catwoman was not the problem. Her representation was. I don’t mind that she has a tight outfit. Whatever. But the overt pandering was ridiculous! The angles the camera chose to focus on were like constantly being forced to looking through the eyes of a hormone-crazed, knuckledragging idiot (I don’t much appreciate that).
Same for the other prominent female character, Harley Quinn.
Holy. Shit.
Harley Quinn.

classic harl vs new
From silly, sassy, and tragic, to borderline hentai idiocy

Honestly? I could forgive all these other infractions if they didn’t also directly affect Harley Quinn. She’s one of my favorite Batman villains, you see. There is something very likable about her. She is silly and crazy, but in a fun way. She is Powerless, so she has to rely on more human methods which makes her a more interesting character–like Batman (except for that little poison-resistance her girlfriend Ivy gifted her with). And finally, she is tragic. Underneath it all, Harley is a broken, abused woman. Now I don’t so much like that last part as I find it astonishing that in the 90s Batman Animated series, the writers were brilliant enough to come up with something so harsh and compelling (and enraged, that in 2013 that idea is being sold as pseudo-porn). Harley Quinn is, as I see it, DC Comic’s icon for abused women.

“Oops, I’ve gone crazy!”

Do you see how fucking insane (in a not-good-way) it is to remake Harley into a sleezebag? Can they not tell? Or are they just such cursory ‘fans’, these people, that they just don’t give a shit? How come there are articles upon articles about the sexism done upon the characters of Catwoman and Starfire but nothing — fucking NOTHING — about the shit that they are putting Harley Quinn through. Not in the comic circles. And not in the gaming clans. What. The. Hell.
Question mark.

I get it. Everyone’s costumes used to be a little ridiculously tight. But its a new era. They upgraded Superman’s outfit to make his tights look more like chainmail armor. Batman no longer looks like he is wearing ‘hocky-pads‘ while Harley Quinn…Harley Quinn looks like she lost her costume and now has to fight in her bra, underwear, and stockings. WTF kind of ‘upgrade’ is that!? Its progress for everyone but the females and its BULLSHIT!

Okay. *breaths*
Here’s what I know:

I know I don’t support games/comics/movies with MY money if they go out of their way to paint women up with giant, bouncing cleavage or who solely depict every female in-cast as a useless bag of luggage. As a man, this is directly offensive to ME because thats what the fucking developers seem to think I want–it ISN’T.

mad love
“You’re wrong! My Puddin’ does love me! He does!”

Some would argue that women need to be women.
I’m not really sure what the fuck that even means exactly, but I’m guessing it has to do with Kitchens or some erroneous notion that femininity is defined by the curvature of an ass.
Its not about pretending women and men are different. The problem is that games/films/graphic-novels empower men yet tend to showcase women in the most prepubescent displays. Its crap. Its not true. And it propagates hate.
There are, however, several brilliant titles that do not do this. Those games/shows are good by me and have me as a fan.

Other people seem to think that complaining in any way at all about the end-result somehow obstructs the free expression of the developers.
Well its not about censorship, you fucking profligate. Its about realism. Realism, even in a fictional setting is still important to the overall tone and immersion. REALISM — not a pervasive element in today’s modern entertainment vision. So when I see REALISM, I fucking applaud. Why anyone would support a lack thereof and still consider themselves intelligent, I have not a clue. Entitlement, probably.
Personally? I’d prefer to see more Empowerment:

Others yet might argue that the characters don’t belong to me so who am I to judge.
Yeah. They belong to the fans. My beef is that I don’t think the change to Harley’s character in Batman Arkham Asylum/City, New 52 and now Injustice was made based in actual need but as some desire to appeal to the dipshits in the male audience (CLEAVAGE!) which directly resulted in a back-peddling of realism. I don’t care who made the changes. Nobody is above scrutiny to their fans. Its what keeps people honest and forces dumbass comedians to re-read their gags–its a damn good thing (now if only this also applied to movie sequels). Further, this new, supposedly more ‘gritty’ reboot is all assbackwards since the original versions not only portrayed Harley’s abuse more effectively but also more viscerally and yet she was not sexualized. Its called CLASS people! It makes no contextual sense to rip apart her appearance (and by extension demeanor) in this way.

In fact, I’d LOVE to see a writer or director in a televised interview say something like, “Well we got a lot of pressure to ‘modify’ her original costume…you know, at least unzip her top or something. But we decided to just this one time hold the torch for all the geek-girls out there and say ‘NO! Go fuck yourself, because these characters aren’t going to do it for you.’

Finally, people might point out that there are more important issues out there so why even bother talking about something like this?
I say this is more than just a discussion of DC comics. This is a discussion about societal norms and is important. Unless of course, like many ‘gamer dudes’, you enjoy having the community be a sausage-only fest and see the loss of that absolute power as a violation of your rights (in which case, Congratulations! the tests came back, and you are officially everything that is wrong with humanity).

abused harley
Even in that nightgown, Harley isn’t being depicted as titillating but as tragic, hiding the pain behind smiles.

The character that we were shown in the 90s was demeaned and broken. She was sorrowful, yet silly and exciting. Thats what Harley is. She is nuts and a villain yet somehow manages to grasp both a tinge of sympathy and intrigue. There is no reason to inflate her (or for that matter, fucking Selena fucking Kyle’s) boobs. They both worked as they were: Harley – crazy, Selena – seductive. Giving them a slutty makeover has nothing to do with character definition and everything to do with catering to the base of the baser lifeforms among us. Its insulting to the characters, its insulting to the fans, and its insulting to women (especially women fans).
I’m a fan. And I’ve had ENOUGH.

  1. This is friggin’ AWESOME! ❤ ❤ ❤
    Harley LOVES! XD

  2. likamarie says:

    Well, you know, the sad thing is, especially in animated form, these shows are supposed to be geared toward children. Batman, Superman, Spiderman, X-Men, Wonder Woman, etc… And while many are family worthy, it’s disgusting when it turns to this type of exploitation of women. It starts the desensitization of our young boys, and is a rubber stamp to okay the sexual objectification of women. It also teaches the girls a confusing message. She has to be sexy to rise to the occasion; and when in that occasion, has to be strong; while being strong, has to exude hard core sexuality in multiple ways… Yet a self respecting woman would never be that sleazy.

    There is a big difference in being sexy or having sex appeal, vs. being the subject of desire. The first is more of a symbol to be revered. The second is an object to be used. I think the producers have too much brain in their pants, and not enough above the shoulders…

    • That type of mentality (or lack thereof) that you’re talking about is offensive to me personally because those people would have you believe that is the norm for men. And perhaps it is, but it offends me, as a male, nonetheless.

      • Well, that’s the thing that is so wrong. It’s stating that men’s brains are in their crotch, and entitled, while women are supposed to provide that sort of entertainment. This is also the SAME thinking, that make it for abused men to not be believed, because men are supposed to fit the profile of what this type of sleaze is the norm.

        It’s creating a world where boys are being indoctrinated into thinking that this is also normal, and people are very desensitized. Thus, either being part of the problem of expecting certain things from women, or, a victim of the problem because of the fact that it’s also showing girls that this is what men want.

      • Indeed. Internalized oppression is a very sick thing — people placing themselves or others of their group at the mercy of their oppressors. However, intentional objectification or no, the intent is quite irrelevant. The fanboys jeering at these fem characters make it clear that they are merely objects of object of desire, not art or heroism. This socially intrenched attitude of dehumanizing females speaks to the larger and more more devastating form of woman-hating at large.

        Even speaking of things outside the entertainment industry, this extends into the laws being created as well. Sexual crimes, as a for instance, are taken extremely lightly by law enforcement when compared to other affronts against humanity. Internalized oppression is a very sick thing — people placing themselves or others of their group at the mercy of their oppressors. However, intentional objectification or no, the intent is quite irrelevant. The commentators jeering at this woman make it clear that she is the object of desire here, not the art. This socially intrenched attitude of dehumanizing females speaks to the larger and more more devastating form of woman-hating at large.

  3. Not really on-topic for this, but I wanted to share anyway cuz it has to do with being ‘heroic’, ya know? So, I wuz talking about Ironman, Supes and Bats earlier and wanted to share on here…
    Being a hero is not about being stronger. It is about being heroic and self-sacrificing. If a hero has nothing to lose then she/he is just doing a goodly deed with no risk (hence why superman is not a real hero) 😛

    However if we are talking about actual crime-fighting, the Iron Man suit is clearly more effective…but Batman does real detective police-work, which is a plus.

    Also, you DO get points for working hard–it makes you a better rounded individual, kind of a big deal for someone who is taking the lives of others into their hands. I _<

  4. Vree says:

    ‘A great deal of market research has convinced many-a-company that we heterosexual men are little more than simple, lecherous, undisciplined, uncontrollable, sex-addled freaks who cannot possibly play a well-constructed game or read a thrilling tale without demanding that every female even remotely mentioned be promptly undressed (or arguably even worse, dressed up in some absurd ‘sexy’ fashion). I, for one, vehemently reject this fiction.”

    Is there REALLY a “market research” this comes from? Is what you assume REALLY is true and there is a focus group justification for this? Or is it simply a case of lazyness in effort and money saving, and the artists often being erverts themselves? (That last bit may look like a slur, but I honestly find that there is often no need to look for a more complex explanation – frequently the best superhero artists are themselves, yes, perverts. It’s not that they want to sell that to you, it’s just that they make what THEY like, and you, even if you do not have the same tastes, buy it.)

    The honest thing is, I don’t expect impossibilities – it is fully possible to reconcile drawing characters hot for one crowd, and making them have depth for the other. (Same as how noone would care for a movie where Ben Stiller replaces Matt Damon.) It would actually please the crowd who can’t get it up until they can imagine the character having a personality that makes them want to f*ck it. There is really no business justification for this sort of writer laziness.

    • I daresay you’re quite right. I am surprised at myself that mid-rant I paused to lend some false credence to this behavior for the sake or *maybe* making my argument seem more reasonable to those unfunny fucking clowns. Mistake noted.

  5. Sarah says:

    To me it just seems that it is all about how sex sells. If you look at the new Suicide Squad movie, and how Harley is portrayed almost as Miley Cyrus, licking prison bars and acting like a sex crazed animal, it is quite apparent that DC was unsure if their movie would see success, so of course if they appeal to sex “guys” will want to watch it I suppose. I was really excited for the movie too, only to be let down by the unnecessary sexualization. Harley is a crazy, abused girl. Not a sex fiend evil slut.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s